403Webshell
Server IP : 172.67.134.114  /  Your IP : 104.23.197.122
Web Server : Apache/2.4.37
System : Linux almalinux.duckdns.org 4.18.0-553.111.1.el8_10.x86_64 #1 SMP Sun Mar 8 20:06:07 EDT 2026 x86_64
User : ricodeal ( 1046)
PHP Version : 7.4.33
Disable Function : NONE
MySQL : OFF  |  cURL : ON  |  WGET : ON  |  Perl : ON  |  Python : ON  |  Sudo : ON  |  Pkexec : ON
Directory :  /usr/share/doc/postgresql-docs/html/

Upload File :
current_dir [ Writeable ] document_root [ Writeable ]

 

Command :


[ Back ]     

Current File : /usr/share/doc/postgresql-docs/html/sql-lock.html
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"><html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" /><title>LOCK</title><link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="stylesheet.css" /><link rev="made" href="[email protected]" /><meta name="generator" content="DocBook XSL Stylesheets Vsnapshot" /><link rel="prev" href="sql-load.html" title="LOAD" /><link rel="next" href="sql-move.html" title="MOVE" /></head><body><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/transitional" class="navheader"><table width="100%" summary="Navigation header"><tr><th colspan="5" align="center">LOCK</th></tr><tr><td width="10%" align="left"><a accesskey="p" href="sql-load.html" title="LOAD">Prev</a> </td><td width="10%" align="left"><a accesskey="u" href="sql-commands.html" title="SQL Commands">Up</a></td><th width="60%" align="center">SQL Commands</th><td width="10%" align="right"><a accesskey="h" href="index.html" title="PostgreSQL 10.23 Documentation">Home</a></td><td width="10%" align="right"> <a accesskey="n" href="sql-move.html" title="MOVE">Next</a></td></tr></table><hr></hr></div><div class="refentry" id="SQL-LOCK"><div class="titlepage"></div><a id="id-1.9.3.149.1" class="indexterm"></a><div class="refnamediv"><h2><span class="refentrytitle">LOCK</span></h2><p>LOCK — lock a table</p></div><div class="refsynopsisdiv"><h2>Synopsis</h2><pre class="synopsis">LOCK [ TABLE ] [ ONLY ] <em class="replaceable"><code>name</code></em> [ * ] [, ...] [ IN <em class="replaceable"><code>lockmode</code></em> MODE ] [ NOWAIT ]

<span class="phrase">where <em class="replaceable"><code>lockmode</code></em> is one of:</span>

    ACCESS SHARE | ROW SHARE | ROW EXCLUSIVE | SHARE UPDATE EXCLUSIVE
    | SHARE | SHARE ROW EXCLUSIVE | EXCLUSIVE | ACCESS EXCLUSIVE</pre></div><div class="refsect1" id="id-1.9.3.149.5"><h2>Description</h2><p>   <code class="command">LOCK TABLE</code> obtains a table-level lock, waiting
   if necessary for any conflicting locks to be released.  If
   <code class="literal">NOWAIT</code> is specified, <code class="command">LOCK
   TABLE</code> does not wait to acquire the desired lock: if it
   cannot be acquired immediately, the command is aborted and an
   error is emitted.  Once obtained, the lock is held for the
   remainder of the current transaction.  (There is no <code class="command">UNLOCK
   TABLE</code> command; locks are always released at transaction
   end.)
  </p><p>   When acquiring locks automatically for commands that reference
   tables, <span class="productname">PostgreSQL</span> always uses the least
   restrictive lock mode possible. <code class="command">LOCK TABLE</code>
   provides for cases when you might need more restrictive locking.
   For example, suppose an application runs a transaction at the
   <code class="literal">READ COMMITTED</code> isolation level and needs to ensure that
   data in a table remains stable for the duration of the transaction.
   To achieve this you could obtain <code class="literal">SHARE</code> lock mode over the
   table before querying. This will prevent concurrent data changes
   and ensure subsequent reads of the table see a stable view of
   committed data, because <code class="literal">SHARE</code> lock mode conflicts with
   the <code class="literal">ROW EXCLUSIVE</code> lock acquired by writers, and your
   <code class="command">LOCK TABLE <em class="replaceable"><code>name</code></em> IN SHARE MODE</code>
   statement will wait until any concurrent holders of <code class="literal">ROW
   EXCLUSIVE</code> mode locks commit or roll back. Thus, once you
   obtain the lock, there are no uncommitted writes outstanding;
   furthermore none can begin until you release the lock.
  </p><p>   To achieve a similar effect when running a transaction at the
   <code class="literal">REPEATABLE READ</code> or <code class="literal">SERIALIZABLE</code>
   isolation level, you have to execute the <code class="command">LOCK TABLE</code> statement
   before executing any <code class="command">SELECT</code> or data modification statement.
   A <code class="literal">REPEATABLE READ</code> or <code class="literal">SERIALIZABLE</code> transaction's
   view of data will be frozen when its first
   <code class="command">SELECT</code> or data modification statement begins.  A <code class="command">LOCK
   TABLE</code> later in the transaction will still prevent concurrent writes
   — but it won't ensure that what the transaction reads corresponds to
   the latest committed values.
  </p><p>   If a transaction of this sort is going to change the data in the
   table, then it should use <code class="literal">SHARE ROW EXCLUSIVE</code> lock mode
   instead of <code class="literal">SHARE</code> mode.  This ensures that only one
   transaction of this type runs at a time.  Without this, a deadlock
   is possible: two transactions might both acquire <code class="literal">SHARE</code>
   mode, and then be unable to also acquire <code class="literal">ROW EXCLUSIVE</code>
   mode to actually perform their updates.  (Note that a transaction's
   own locks never conflict, so a transaction can acquire <code class="literal">ROW
   EXCLUSIVE</code> mode when it holds <code class="literal">SHARE</code> mode — but not
   if anyone else holds <code class="literal">SHARE</code> mode.)  To avoid deadlocks,
   make sure all transactions acquire locks on the same objects in the
   same order, and if multiple lock modes are involved for a single
   object, then transactions should always acquire the most
   restrictive mode first.
  </p><p>   More information about the lock modes and locking strategies can be
   found in <a class="xref" href="explicit-locking.html" title="13.3. Explicit Locking">Section 13.3</a>.
  </p></div><div class="refsect1" id="id-1.9.3.149.6"><h2>Parameters</h2><div class="variablelist"><dl class="variablelist"><dt><span class="term"><em class="replaceable"><code>name</code></em></span></dt><dd><p>      The name (optionally schema-qualified) of an existing table to
      lock. If <code class="literal">ONLY</code> is specified before the table name, only that
      table is locked. If <code class="literal">ONLY</code> is not specified, the table and all
      its descendant tables (if any) are locked.  Optionally, <code class="literal">*</code>
      can be specified after the table name to explicitly indicate that
      descendant tables are included.
     </p><p>      The command <code class="literal">LOCK TABLE a, b;</code> is equivalent to
      <code class="literal">LOCK TABLE a; LOCK TABLE b;</code>. The tables are locked
      one-by-one in the order specified in the <code class="command">LOCK
      TABLE</code> command.
     </p></dd><dt><span class="term"><em class="replaceable"><code>lockmode</code></em></span></dt><dd><p>      The lock mode specifies which locks this lock conflicts with.
      Lock modes are described in <a class="xref" href="explicit-locking.html" title="13.3. Explicit Locking">Section 13.3</a>.
     </p><p>      If no lock mode is specified, then <code class="literal">ACCESS
      EXCLUSIVE</code>, the most restrictive mode, is used.
     </p></dd><dt><span class="term"><code class="literal">NOWAIT</code></span></dt><dd><p>      Specifies that <code class="command">LOCK TABLE</code> should not wait for
      any conflicting locks to be released: if the specified lock(s)
      cannot be acquired immediately without waiting, the transaction
      is aborted.
     </p></dd></dl></div></div><div class="refsect1" id="id-1.9.3.149.7"><h2>Notes</h2><p>    <code class="literal">LOCK TABLE ... IN ACCESS SHARE MODE</code> requires <code class="literal">SELECT</code>
    privileges on the target table.  <code class="literal">LOCK TABLE ... IN ROW EXCLUSIVE
    MODE</code> requires <code class="literal">INSERT</code>, <code class="literal">UPDATE</code>, <code class="literal">DELETE</code>,
    or <code class="literal">TRUNCATE</code> privileges on the target table. All other forms of
    <code class="command">LOCK</code> require table-level <code class="literal">UPDATE</code>, <code class="literal">DELETE</code>,
    or <code class="literal">TRUNCATE</code> privileges.
   </p><p>    <code class="command">LOCK TABLE</code> is useless outside a transaction block: the lock
    would remain held only to the completion of the statement.  Therefore
    <span class="productname">PostgreSQL</span> reports an error if <code class="command">LOCK</code>
    is used outside a transaction block.
    Use
    <a class="xref" href="sql-begin.html" title="BEGIN"><span class="refentrytitle">BEGIN</span></a> and
    <a class="xref" href="sql-commit.html" title="COMMIT"><span class="refentrytitle">COMMIT</span></a>
    (or <a class="xref" href="sql-rollback.html" title="ROLLBACK"><span class="refentrytitle">ROLLBACK</span></a>)
    to define a transaction block.
   </p><p>   <code class="command">LOCK TABLE</code> only deals with table-level locks, and so
   the mode names involving <code class="literal">ROW</code> are all misnomers.  These
   mode names should generally be read as indicating the intention of
   the user to acquire row-level locks within the locked table.  Also,
   <code class="literal">ROW EXCLUSIVE</code> mode is a shareable table lock.  Keep in
   mind that all the lock modes have identical semantics so far as
   <code class="command">LOCK TABLE</code> is concerned, differing only in the rules
   about which modes conflict with which. For information on how to
   acquire an actual row-level lock, see <a class="xref" href="explicit-locking.html#LOCKING-ROWS" title="13.3.2. Row-level Locks">Section 13.3.2</a>
   and the <a class="xref" href="sql-select.html#SQL-FOR-UPDATE-SHARE" title="The Locking Clause">The Locking Clause</a> in the <code class="command">SELECT</code>
   reference documentation.
  </p></div><div class="refsect1" id="id-1.9.3.149.8"><h2>Examples</h2><p>   Obtain a <code class="literal">SHARE</code> lock on a primary key table when going to perform
   inserts into a foreign key table:

</p><pre class="programlisting">BEGIN WORK;
LOCK TABLE films IN SHARE MODE;
SELECT id FROM films
    WHERE name = 'Star Wars: Episode I - The Phantom Menace';
-- Do ROLLBACK if record was not returned
INSERT INTO films_user_comments VALUES
    (_id_, 'GREAT! I was waiting for it for so long!');
COMMIT WORK;</pre><p>
  </p><p>   Take a <code class="literal">SHARE ROW EXCLUSIVE</code> lock on a primary key table when going to perform
   a delete operation:

</p><pre class="programlisting">BEGIN WORK;
LOCK TABLE films IN SHARE ROW EXCLUSIVE MODE;
DELETE FROM films_user_comments WHERE id IN
    (SELECT id FROM films WHERE rating &lt; 5);
DELETE FROM films WHERE rating &lt; 5;
COMMIT WORK;</pre></div><div class="refsect1" id="id-1.9.3.149.9"><h2>Compatibility</h2><p>   There is no <code class="command">LOCK TABLE</code> in the SQL standard,
   which instead uses <code class="command">SET TRANSACTION</code> to specify
   concurrency levels on transactions.  <span class="productname">PostgreSQL</span> supports that too;
   see <a class="xref" href="sql-set-transaction.html" title="SET TRANSACTION"><span class="refentrytitle">SET TRANSACTION</span></a> for details.
  </p><p>   Except for <code class="literal">ACCESS SHARE</code>, <code class="literal">ACCESS EXCLUSIVE</code>,
   and <code class="literal">SHARE UPDATE EXCLUSIVE</code> lock modes, the
   <span class="productname">PostgreSQL</span> lock modes and the
   <code class="command">LOCK TABLE</code> syntax are compatible with those
   present in <span class="productname">Oracle</span>.
  </p></div></div><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/transitional" class="navfooter"><hr></hr><table width="100%" summary="Navigation footer"><tr><td width="40%" align="left"><a accesskey="p" href="sql-load.html" title="LOAD">Prev</a> </td><td width="20%" align="center"><a accesskey="u" href="sql-commands.html" title="SQL Commands">Up</a></td><td width="40%" align="right"> <a accesskey="n" href="sql-move.html" title="MOVE">Next</a></td></tr><tr><td width="40%" align="left" valign="top">LOAD </td><td width="20%" align="center"><a accesskey="h" href="index.html" title="PostgreSQL 10.23 Documentation">Home</a></td><td width="40%" align="right" valign="top"> MOVE</td></tr></table></div></body></html>

Youez - 2016 - github.com/yon3zu
LinuXploit