403Webshell
Server IP : 172.67.134.114  /  Your IP : 104.23.197.122
Web Server : Apache/2.4.37
System : Linux almalinux.duckdns.org 4.18.0-553.111.1.el8_10.x86_64 #1 SMP Sun Mar 8 20:06:07 EDT 2026 x86_64
User : ricodeal ( 1046)
PHP Version : 7.4.33
Disable Function : NONE
MySQL : OFF  |  cURL : ON  |  WGET : ON  |  Perl : ON  |  Python : ON  |  Sudo : ON  |  Pkexec : ON
Directory :  /usr/share/doc/postgresql-docs/html/

Upload File :
current_dir [ Writeable ] document_root [ Writeable ]

 

Command :


[ Back ]     

Current File : /usr/share/doc/postgresql-docs/html/indexes-ordering.html
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"><html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" /><title>11.4. Indexes and ORDER BY</title><link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="stylesheet.css" /><link rev="made" href="[email protected]" /><meta name="generator" content="DocBook XSL Stylesheets Vsnapshot" /><link rel="prev" href="indexes-multicolumn.html" title="11.3. Multicolumn Indexes" /><link rel="next" href="indexes-bitmap-scans.html" title="11.5. Combining Multiple Indexes" /></head><body><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/transitional" class="navheader"><table width="100%" summary="Navigation header"><tr><th colspan="5" align="center">11.4. Indexes and <code xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" class="literal">ORDER BY</code></th></tr><tr><td width="10%" align="left"><a accesskey="p" href="indexes-multicolumn.html" title="11.3. Multicolumn Indexes">Prev</a> </td><td width="10%" align="left"><a accesskey="u" href="indexes.html" title="Chapter 11. Indexes">Up</a></td><th width="60%" align="center">Chapter 11. Indexes</th><td width="10%" align="right"><a accesskey="h" href="index.html" title="PostgreSQL 10.23 Documentation">Home</a></td><td width="10%" align="right"> <a accesskey="n" href="indexes-bitmap-scans.html" title="11.5. Combining Multiple Indexes">Next</a></td></tr></table><hr></hr></div><div class="sect1" id="INDEXES-ORDERING"><div class="titlepage"><div><div><h2 class="title" style="clear: both">11.4. Indexes and <code class="literal">ORDER BY</code></h2></div></div></div><a id="id-1.5.10.7.2" class="indexterm"></a><p>   In addition to simply finding the rows to be returned by a query,
   an index may be able to deliver them in a specific sorted order.
   This allows a query's <code class="literal">ORDER BY</code> specification to be honored
   without a separate sorting step.  Of the index types currently
   supported by <span class="productname">PostgreSQL</span>, only B-tree
   can produce sorted output — the other index types return
   matching rows in an unspecified, implementation-dependent order.
  </p><p>   The planner will consider satisfying an <code class="literal">ORDER BY</code> specification
   either by scanning an available index that matches the specification,
   or by scanning the table in physical order and doing an explicit
   sort.  For a query that requires scanning a large fraction of the
   table, an explicit sort is likely to be faster than using an index
   because it requires
   less disk I/O due to following a sequential access pattern.  Indexes are
   more useful when only a few rows need be fetched.  An important
   special case is <code class="literal">ORDER BY</code> in combination with
   <code class="literal">LIMIT</code> <em class="replaceable"><code>n</code></em>: an explicit sort will have to process
   all the data to identify the first <em class="replaceable"><code>n</code></em> rows, but if there is
   an index matching the <code class="literal">ORDER BY</code>, the first <em class="replaceable"><code>n</code></em>
   rows can be retrieved directly, without scanning the remainder at all.
  </p><p>   By default, B-tree indexes store their entries in ascending order
   with nulls last.  This means that a forward scan of an index on
   column <code class="literal">x</code> produces output satisfying <code class="literal">ORDER BY x</code>
   (or more verbosely, <code class="literal">ORDER BY x ASC NULLS LAST</code>).  The
   index can also be scanned backward, producing output satisfying
   <code class="literal">ORDER BY x DESC</code>
   (or more verbosely, <code class="literal">ORDER BY x DESC NULLS FIRST</code>, since
   <code class="literal">NULLS FIRST</code> is the default for <code class="literal">ORDER BY DESC</code>).
  </p><p>   You can adjust the ordering of a B-tree index by including the
   options <code class="literal">ASC</code>, <code class="literal">DESC</code>, <code class="literal">NULLS FIRST</code>,
   and/or <code class="literal">NULLS LAST</code> when creating the index; for example:
</p><pre class="programlisting">CREATE INDEX test2_info_nulls_low ON test2 (info NULLS FIRST);
CREATE INDEX test3_desc_index ON test3 (id DESC NULLS LAST);</pre><p>
   An index stored in ascending order with nulls first can satisfy
   either <code class="literal">ORDER BY x ASC NULLS FIRST</code> or
   <code class="literal">ORDER BY x DESC NULLS LAST</code> depending on which direction
   it is scanned in.
  </p><p>   You might wonder why bother providing all four options, when two
   options together with the possibility of backward scan would cover
   all the variants of <code class="literal">ORDER BY</code>.  In single-column indexes
   the options are indeed redundant, but in multicolumn indexes they can be
   useful.  Consider a two-column index on <code class="literal">(x, y)</code>: this can
   satisfy <code class="literal">ORDER BY x, y</code> if we scan forward, or
   <code class="literal">ORDER BY x DESC, y DESC</code> if we scan backward.
   But it might be that the application frequently needs to use
   <code class="literal">ORDER BY x ASC, y DESC</code>.  There is no way to get that
   ordering from a plain index, but it is possible if the index is defined
   as <code class="literal">(x ASC, y DESC)</code> or <code class="literal">(x DESC, y ASC)</code>.
  </p><p>   Obviously, indexes with non-default sort orderings are a fairly
   specialized feature, but sometimes they can produce tremendous
   speedups for certain queries.  Whether it's worth maintaining such an
   index depends on how often you use queries that require a special
   sort ordering.
  </p></div><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/transitional" class="navfooter"><hr></hr><table width="100%" summary="Navigation footer"><tr><td width="40%" align="left"><a accesskey="p" href="indexes-multicolumn.html" title="11.3. Multicolumn Indexes">Prev</a> </td><td width="20%" align="center"><a accesskey="u" href="indexes.html" title="Chapter 11. Indexes">Up</a></td><td width="40%" align="right"> <a accesskey="n" href="indexes-bitmap-scans.html" title="11.5. Combining Multiple Indexes">Next</a></td></tr><tr><td width="40%" align="left" valign="top">11.3. Multicolumn Indexes </td><td width="20%" align="center"><a accesskey="h" href="index.html" title="PostgreSQL 10.23 Documentation">Home</a></td><td width="40%" align="right" valign="top"> 11.5. Combining Multiple Indexes</td></tr></table></div></body></html>

Youez - 2016 - github.com/yon3zu
LinuXploit